HOW TO DEPOPULATE THE WORLD WITH VACCINES
In 1993, WHO announced a “birth-control vaccine” for “family planning”. Published research shows that by 1976 WHO researchers had conjugated tetanus toxoid (TT) with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) producing a “birth-control” vaccine. Conjugating TT with hCG causes pregnancy hormones to be attacked by the immune system. Expected results are abortions in females already pregnant and/or infertility in recipients not yet impregnated. Repeated inoculations prolong infertility. Currently WHO researchers are working on more potent anti-fertility vaccines using recombinant DNA. WHO publications show a long-range purpose to reduce population growth in unstable “less developed countries”
THE ABOVE IS NOT A REPORT FROM SOME CONSPIRACY WEBSITE.
The above is the opening of a report published on PubMed subsequent to a study entitled ‘HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World’.
This report makes required reading for anybody interested in the history of vaccines. For it would be impossible to come away from it believing there hasn’t been a long established agenda to use vaccines – and in particular tetanus vaccines - as a viable means of fertility control in the Third World.
This has to be understood in the context of US imperialist designs on the abundant mineral resources contained in the Third World countries and the overriding concern expressed in the Kissinger Report of 1974 that the imminent possibility of population explosion in the third world nations was a direct threat to the US since the US was increasingly dependent on imports of vital minerals from these same countries. Inevitably the more pressure placed on the home economy by rise in population the higher the likely cost of exports and imports for foreign nations.
The report also outlines the progress of eugenicist policies in America from the foundation in 1916 of Margaret Sanger’s first birth control clinics, later to evolve into the Planned Parenthood organisation in the US, up to and including Bill Gates’ expressed intent in 2010 ‘if we do a really good job with vaccines’ to see population diminution of 10-15%. Add to this that Gates in the same year announced the decade of vaccines, it is hardly surprising to find his Foundation attempting a sterilisation by stealth programme in Kenya in 2015, nor for that matter to see the world wide distribution of a vaccine in 2020 for COVID19 with known risks of causing infertility in women.
Independent testing of the tetanus vaccine rolled out in Kenya in 2015 found HCG (human chorionic gonadotropin) in more than half of the vaccines tested. I would suggest the only reason it was only found in half was that when the WHO realised they’d been rumbled they hastily replaced the sterilizing batches with normal batches...
HCG is a pregnancy hormone produced by women when pregnant to prevent further pregnancy. The Kenyan women were all told the vaccine would prevent their unborn babies against tetanus. They were told they had to have five shots – one every 6 months.
The Kenyan government strenuously denied the allegations but that is hardly surprising since any third world government is a captured agency for the oligarchs that bank roll them. Mandatory vaccination campaigns are integral part of the package they sign up to when they accept funding from international NGO’s.
The report provides all the ingredients necessary for indictment – history, motive, intent and implementation.
A particular feature of the 2015 campaign in Kenya was the extraordinary security surrounding the roll out and the refusal to out- source to other care providers. The vaccine had to be administered under the baleful eyes of WHO officials at all times.
Maybe the WHO could have explained the restriction of the campaign solely to girls and women of child bearing age, the exclusion of males, minors and seniors - all of whom would be equally susceptible to tetanus infection – by saying that it was specifically targeted at protecting unborn foetuses if it weren’t for the fact that research into conjugating tetanus toxoid (TT) with HCG to produce a ‘birth control vaccine’ dates back to 1976.
See Corbett Report for Exhaustive discussion on this issue and the Polio vaccine in India (see below)
BILL GATES' PLAN TO VACCINATE THE WORLD
https://www.corbettreport.com/gatesvaccine and
https://www.corbettreport.com/gates
See also:
CORRELATION BETWEEN NON-POLIO ACUTE FLACCID PARALYSIS RATES WITH PULSE POLIO FREQUENCY IN INDIA
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121585/pdf/ijerph-15-01755.pdf
And when you come across the Fact Checkers before dismissing this information watch this:
FACT CHECK: POLIO VACCINES, TETANUS VACCINES, AND THE GATES FOUNDATION
https://www.corbettreport.com/fact-check-polio-vaccines-tetanus-vaccines-and-the-gates-foundation
Meningitis Vaccine Project
In 2002 the MenAfriVac campaign was launched in Africa. Thousands of African children were forcibly vaccinated. 10% of these children developed paralysis. On December 20th 2012 in the small village of Gouro, located in northern Chad, Africa, according to a newspaper La Voix out of 500 children who received MenAfriVac at least 40, between the ages of 7 and 18, were paralysed. Those children also suffered from hallucinations and convulsions.
See https://sanevax.org/menafrivac-tragedy-in-africa
Now available here: https://web.archive.org/web/20210505130836/https://sanevax.org/menafrivac-tragedy-in-africa
See also
VIDEO PROOF - DANGEROUS VACCINE PARALYZES 40 CHILDREN, PRIME MINISTER VISITS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEBGG7KFQpU
MenAfriVac was an initiative of PATH & the WHO funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Newspapers started to complain African people were being used as guinea pigs. Bill Gates was described accurately as ruthless and immoral.
If you read the report on MenAfriVac in The Lancet you’d believe that it was fully successful, reducing the incidence of Meningitis by 59%. But before we start applauding take note of this sentence:
‘Nevertheless, data quality is a concern and poses challenges for the interpretation of the surveillance data. For example, in Benin and Ghana, the IRR for suspected meningitis cases was higher post MenAfriVac. Since the number of suspected cases was low and the confirmed case data show no group A disease after vaccine introduction and a mix of other pathogens, it is likely that this reflects improvements in the sensitivity of surveillance over time rather than a genuine increase in disease’
IMPACT OF MENAFRIVAC IN NINE COUNTRIES OF THE AFRICAN MENINGITIS BELT, 2010–15: AN ANALYSIS OF SURVEILLANCE DATA
See https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(17)30301-8/fulltext
The USP of this vaccine was that it did not have to be transported at the usual low temperatures required for vaccines, therefore it didn’t need refrigeration. This could be found advertised on the websites of all the following:
- CDC – Centers for Disease Control
- FDA – Food and Drug Administration
- BMGF – The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- PATH – Program for Appropriate Technology in Health
- MVP – Meningitis Vaccine Project
- WHO – World Health Organization
- UNICEF – United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund
For details see this important website:
https://vactruth.com/2013/01/13/children-paralyzed-by-vaccine
And yet when we look on the instructions for this vaccine we find completely different information:
“MenAfriVac should be stored and transported between 2-8ºC. Protect from light. The diluent should be stored at 25°C. It is recommended to protect the reconstituted vaccine from direct sunlight.”
The manufacturer of MenAfriVac, Serum Institute of India, 2010
So there were two issues with this vaccine:
The first issue was that, considering the native climate in Africa the possibility of storing between 2-8 degrees centigrade was never going to happen.
The second issue is highlighted in a letter to the Norwegian government dated January 19, 2013 written by a concerned citizen highlighting the dangers of combining mercury and aluminium adjuvants:
“I am referring firstly to the controversial meningococcal vaccine project which took place in Norway 1988 – 91 and then to the meningococcal vaccine MenAfriVac which we understand is intended for millions of Africans.
Here is the main report for the study in Norway.
http://www.regjeringen.no/Upload/HOD/Dokumenter%20FHA/Meningokokk/Hovedrapport.pdf (Norwegian).
(The conclusion is on page 168).
It is noted with concern that the unusual combination of both aluminium and mercury were present in the vaccine (also in the “placebo”, page 39), although it is well known that these two substances exhibit considerable synergistic toxicity, a fact which is confirmed by competent toxicologists.
A small dose of mercury that kills 1 in 100 rats and a dose of aluminum that will kill 1 in 100 rats, when combined have a striking effect: all the rats die:
“Doses of mercury that have a 1 percent mortality will have a 100 percent mortality rate if some aluminum is there”.
(Donald Miller, M.D. Professor of Surgery, University of Washington)
Regarding this matter, my several attempts over the last few years for a response showing interest from the Norwegian authorities and others have unfortunately been fruitless.
It has come to my attention that the MenAfriVac meningococcal vaccine is intended for millions of Africans.
http://www.meningvax.org/
It is of deep concern to note that this vaccine also contains the dangerous, synergistically toxic combination of aluminium and mercury:
http://www.cdsco.nic.in/SMPC/Serum%20-%20Men%20A%20Conjugate%20vaccine%20.pdf
Aluminium (adjuvant)
Mercury/ Thiomersal (preservative)
Trusting that the safety of vaccine recipients is carefully and conscientiously considered, independently of the ultimate goal of vaccinating millions of people:
I thus respectfully request that this matter be carefully investigated by competent and independent experts including toxicologists.
Awaiting your response to this matter with great interest
See https://sanevax.org/menafrivac-tragedy-in-africa
I quote this letter in full because it echoes a very similar letter I addressed to my local MP when the issue of mandatory vaccines for COVID19 came up (See COVID LETTERS). It will be seen that my letter was similarly courteous and factual - and it was similarly ignored. I have left in the links above to show that the lady’s concerns were scientifically established, though I was not surprised to find that none of the links are still active in 2021. Suffice to say scientific studies exist to prove the lethality of the combination of aluminium and mercury when combined as adjuvants.
Aluminium has been added to vaccines since 1926 when Alexander Glenny and colleagues realised it helped improve the antibody response over what could be achieved with the antigen alone. Glenny figured the alum was inducing what he called a "depot effect" – slowing the release of the antigen and heightening the immune response. For 60 years this theory has been accepted as dogma (bit like the Central Dogma of Genetic Theory and Germ Theory). And during that time, the vaccine schedule has grown decade on decade, and yet few have questioned the effects of injecting accumulative levels of aluminium into the body, in spite of the fact aluminium is a known neuro- toxin.
In 1998 French researcher Romain Gerhardi had the courage to raise the question. His conclusions led him to declare the immune system's reaction to aluminium as "representing a major health challenge”, and he added that "attempts to seriously examine safety concerns raised by the bio-persistent character and brain accumulation of alum particles have not been made... A lot must be done to understand how, in certain individuals, alum-containing vaccines may become insidiously unsafe."
See https://science.sciencemag.org/content/288/5470/1323.full
HPV VACCINE
In 2009 THE Gates Foundation in alliance with PATH tested the HPV vaccine created by Merck and GlaxoSmith Kline on 23000 girls in remote villages in India. 1200 girls had severe and chronic side effects including fertility disorders and autoimmune disease. This represents 5.2% of the vaccinated population. 7 girls died. 1000’s suffered severe convulsions. The WHO admitted the vaccine could cause convulsions, but stated it would only affect girls with a certain gene. Well apparently 5.2% for all girls have that gene. I have seen video footage (See Infowars.com) of multiple children in one school (they all have the same uniform) all at one time experiencing convulsions with carers picking through the bodies writhing on the floor.
A recent article published in the journal Pharmacological Research in which Shoenfeld and colleagues issue unprecedented guidelines naming four categories of people who are most at risk for vaccine-induced autoimmunity.
Yehuda Shoenfeld is known as the Godfather of Autoimmunology. His name has been lent to a syndrome known as ASIA.
ASIA – or Autoimmune/inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants (also known as Shoenfeld's syndrome) -- first appeared in the Journal of Autoimmunology five years ago in 2016. It is an umbrella term for a collection of similar symptoms, including Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, that result after exposure to an adjuvant – an environmental agent including common vaccine ingredients that stimulate the immune system. Since then an enormous body of research, using ASIA as a paradigm, has begun to unravel the mystery of how environmental toxins, particularly the metal aluminium used in vaccines, can trigger an immune system chain reaction in susceptible individuals and may lead to overt autoimmune disease.
Regarding those who have had a previous adverse reaction to vaccines, the paper cites five relevant studies including the case of a death of a teenage girl six months following her third Gardasil injection against HPV virus. She had experienced a range of symptoms shortly after her first dose, including dizziness, numbness and tingling in her hands, and memory lapses. After her second injection, she developed "intermittent arm weakness, frequent tiredness requiring daytime naps," worse tingling, night sweats, chest pain and palpitations. A full autopsy was unrevealing but blood and spleen tissue analysis revealed HPV-16 L1 gene DNA fragments – matching the DNA found in vials of the Gardasil vaccine against cervical cancer – "thus implicating the vaccine as a causal factor." The DNA fragments had also been found to be "complexed with the aluminum adjuvant" which, according to the report, have been shown to persist for up to 8 to 10 years causing chronic immune system stimulation.
"Although data is limited," Shoenfeld and his colleagues concluded, "it seems preferable that individuals with prior autoimmune or autoimmune-like reactions to vaccinations, should not be immunized, at least not with the same type of vaccine."
There is an article on PubMed entitled Syncope and seizures following human papillomavirus vaccination: a retrospective case series. This examines the mass roll out of the HPV vaccine in India. See:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21449862
In 2012 the Indian Parliament took the vaccine manufacturers to court. The allegations were as follows
1 Pressurizing vulnerable village girls into the trial
2 Bullying parents
3 Forging consent forms
4 Refusing medical care to the injured girls
The case is still outstanding in 2021 – 9 years later; which is indicative of the strength of the pharmaceutical lobby. In some ways it’s academic what the outcome of the court case is. The only people that will be found guilty are the researchers that made the vaccine on behalf of their lords and masters, that is the Gates Foundation, PATH and the WHO will have no liability. You can’t penalise US NGO’s for violating drug trial norms.
See here for article outlining the concerns and conflicts of interest underpinning Gate’s vaccination campaigns in India:
HPV is now available for Boys. Apparently the same virus that may cause cervical cancer in girls may cause throat cancer in boys.
Do you see how they can say ANYTHING – anything they like? No matter how ludicrous. No matter how irrational. Would it not have made more sense to say the same virus may cause genital warts in boys?
But anyways it’s entirely immaterial what they say; because it’s all nonsense anyway. Since a virus has never been isolated, since transmissibility is a purely academic exercise for PHD’s in white coats sat at computer screens and since every ordinary citizen is programmed to accept whatever nonsense these white coats want to come up with next we should not be surprised if they take any opportunity open to them to double the revenue stream available from their highly questionable product. The fact that it’ll soon be mandated for every child should not surprise us either.
Since this is the objective of the current Plandemic – to establish the principle of mandatory vaccines across the globe for ALL conditions that may be highlighted as a threat to the ‘public good’ which could of course cover every disease ever dreamt up by Mankind....
MALARIA VACCINE
In 2010 Gates funded a trial of an experimental malaria vaccine made by GlaxoSmith Kline. 20% of those trialled suffered severe side effects – convulsions and paralysis. 151 babies died.
According to the WHO’s website no more side effects were experienced than with normal childhood vaccine.
I personally don’t find that reassuring.
Malaria. Do you begin to see where this is going? A vaccine for every illness you can think of.
Prophylaxis.
You don’t need a vaccine against malaria:
Andrew Saul describes on his website. www.Doctoryourself.com how his grandfather worked on the Panama Canal. And how he himself in his college days, spent time in both Central America and in equatorial Africa and how the standard way of warding off mosquitoes or the deleterious effect of mosquito bites was drinking large quantities of tonic water. Saul comments:
‘It is significant that the conventional medical treatment of malaria still relies on the use of quinine, even after some 300 years. While heavy dosage of quinine has its side effects, in moderation it appears to have worked for me, and presumably for my grandfather. Modern antimalarial drugs also have significant, often serious, side effects.’
See http://www.doctoryourself.com/news/v3n8.html
I have personal experience of the efficacy of quinine when suffering from a fever for any reason. Whenever I’ve had a fever I’ve resorted to tonic water.
The thing to remember is that a fever is always as a result of the body contending with some toxic insult – or ‘infection’ as we like to call it. The fever is not the problem. The fever is the body’s solution to the problem. The way to tackle the fever is not to pile in the antipyretics the panadol and ibuprofen, but to find ways in which to assist the body in adapting to the pathogen that is causing the fever in the first place.
I recently came across a home recipe for making quinine which explained to me why Tonic Water is so effective at controlling fever. The recipe involved boiling down the skins of grapefruits and lemons – but particularly grapefruits. What are these citrus fruits most renowned for in health applications? Answer: Vitamin C
I have read of a man who discovered the best way to survive in the tropics was drinking pints of lemon water. Again the same thing. Citrus fruits contain Vitamin C. Vitamin C is an anti microbial, anti viral ant biotic ant oxidant. There is nothing that Vitamin C does not contribute to your health and well being.
We are told that the particular mosquitoes we are attempting to evade carry a single-celled parasite, called a plasmodium, which causes malaria and that malaria has been, and remains, one of the major killers on our planet, killing hundreds of thousands a year (409,000 in 2019 according to the WHO), the majority of whom are children.
The main protection against malaria is ‘vector control’ described as follows: ‘WHO recommends protection for all people at risk of malaria with effective malaria vector control. Two forms of vector control – insecticide-treated mosquito nets and indoor residual spraying – are effective in a wide range of circumstances.’
See https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malaria
While there are now a number of costly drugs used to fight malaria, drug-resistant strains of the disease have rendered them increasingly untrustworthy.
WHO says that "40% of the world's population - mostly those living in the poorest countries - is at risk for malaria," and that over 300 million people a year get the disease.
The critical statement here is mostly those living in the poorest countries. As Andrew Saul points out on his website ‘malaria is effectively a symptom of poor living conditions and low resistance to illness in general.’ These are the real angles to explore in order to eliminate malaria, and for that matter, most other diseases.’
See http://www.doctoryourself.com/news/v3n8.html
What are the symptoms of malaria? Flu like symptoms. What are flu like symptoms indicative of? A cell mediated response in the organism to infection. What is infection? Infection is not something that comes from without. Infection is an incapacity of the immune system to cope with something coming from without – there is a difference. The task of the physician is to ensure that the innate immune system is equipped to cope with all challenges that it encounters; that is, the disease is in itself a symptom of insufficiency. The doctor must remedy the insufficiency.
The insufficiency is always nutritional. Why is malaria most prevalent in the poorest parts of the world? Nutritional insufficiency is inevitably most prevalent in the poorest parts of the world.
"Ascorbic acid. . . when given in massive repeated doses. . . in acute infectious processes is favorably comparable to that of the sulfonamide or the mycelial antibiotics, but with the great advantage of freedom from toxic or allergic reactions."
McCormick, W. J. (1951) Ascorbic acid as a chemotherapeutic agent. Archives of Pediatrics NY, Volume 69, Number 4, April, 1952, pp. 151-155. See: www.seanet.com/~alexs/ascorbate/195x/mccormick- wj-arch_pediatrics-1952-v69-n4-p151.htm
Related References:
Klenner, Frederick R. (1953) The use of vitamin C as an antibiotic. Journal of Applied Nutrition. 6:274-278, and posted at
www.seanet.com/~alexs/ascorbate/195x/klenner-fr- j_appl_nutr-1953-v6-p274.htm
McCormick, W. J. (1951) Vitamin C in the prophylaxis and therapy of infectious diseases. Archives of Pediatrics NY, Volume 68, Number 1, January, pp. 1-9, which is posted at www.seanet.com/~alexs/ascorbate/195x/mccormick- wj-arch_pediatrics-1951-v68-n1-p1.htm
What practically no physician will tell you about malaria treatment:
GARLIC FOR MALARIA "In cell culture studies, sulphide compounds such as those found in garlic were active against malaria-infected human cells and against cultured melanoma cells. The compounds ajoene and dysoxysulphone may act by affecting an enzyme that allows malarial parasites to infect cells, and which is also present in malignant cells. Despite the garlic's pungent nature, these compounds deserve further study."
Source: Crandall I, et al. Paper at American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene meeting 2001, Toronto. Abstract cited at http://www.everybody.co.nz/nutrition/nnoct22_01maleria.html
See http://www.doctoryourself.com/news/v3n8.html
If the WHO truly cared about the plight of the indigenous populations in Africa they would be advocating the efficacy of Vitamin C and Garlic to alleviate and if in sufficiently high doses eradicate all disease from malaria. Vitamin C alone would do the job, and for a mere fraction of the cost of the pharmaceutical products sponsored and exploited by Bill Gates. If Gates was truly a philanthropist this is what he would be advocating.
Instead:
At the World Health Assembly in May 2015, WHO launched the Strategy for malaria elimination in the Greater Mekong subregion (2015–2030), This Strategy was endorsed by all the countries in the subregion. What alternative did they have I wonder? According to the WHO website:
‘Urging immediate action, the strategy calls for the elimination of all species of human malaria across the region by 2030, with priority action targeted to areas where multidrug resistant malaria has taken root.’
How are they going to do this? You guessed it. With a vaccine. In 2015, the European Medicines Agency – a ‘stringent regulatory authority’ apparently – issued a positive scientific opinion of the RTS,S, vaccine, indicating that the benefits of the vaccine in preventing malaria outweigh potential risks. This is spite of the fact that according to a study published in 2019 a rate of meningitis was revealed in those receiving this vaccine 10 times of those who did not. There was also increased cerebral malaria cases, and a doubling in the risk of death (from any cause) in girls
See https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31012786
The abstract for this study concludes: ‘The observed meningitis and CM signals are considered likely chance findings, that - given their severity - warrant further evaluation in phase IV studies and WHO-led pilot implementation programs to establish the RTS,S/AS01 benefit-risk profile in real-life settings’. And this is the justification for now rolling it out across 720,000 kids.
Charles Weijer, a bioethicist at Western University in Canada, told The BMJ that the failure to obtain informed consent from parents whose children are taking part in the study violates the Ottawa Statement, a consensus statement on the ethics of cluster randomised trials, of which Weijer is the lead author, and the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences’ International Ethical Guidelines. “The failure to require informed consent is a serious breach of international ethical standards,” he said.
See https://childrenshealthdefense.org/research_db/whos-malaria-vaccine-study
The UN health organization defends its testing as being not part of any research project, but simply a “pilot introduction” of the vaccine in all three countries, and that it’s part of a child’s regular vaccine schedule.
This is mere semantics. The W.H.O. know perfectly well what they are rolling out. They’ve been researching it for 30 years. The RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine has been under development by GlaxoSmithKline for 30 years and is the first malaria vaccine to receive regulatory approval for human use.
See https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.l6920
which means they know perfectly well the risks involved. But they’re slipping it in through the back door, including it in a routine vaccine schedule, thus ensuring that they do not need to itemise the risks involved.
The WHO apparently makes a fine distinction between IMPLIED CONSENT AND INFORMED CONSENT
IMPLIED CONSENT v INFORMED CONSENT
A WHO spokesperson explained to the British Medical Journal:
“An implied consent process is one in which parents are informed of imminent vaccination through social mobilization and communication, sometimes including letters directly addressed to parents. Subsequently, the physical presence of the child or adolescent, with or without an accompanying parent at the vaccination session, is considered to imply consent.” https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/canadian-bioethicist-calls-who-malaria-study-involving-kids-serious-breach-of-standards-1.4831210
I reckon it would be naive to assume the letters to parents include a breakdown of the risks involved.
Glaxo Smith Kline announced the new malaria vaccine provided 18–36% protection against malaria, more than any other previous vaccine. Christine Stabell Benn and Peter Aaby scrutinized the research results and found that the vaccine did not reduce mortality. Indeed they found the reverse: overall mortality was 24% higher among people who had been vaccinated against malaria compared with unvaccinated individuals. Read that again – 24% higher mortality amongst the vaccinated as opposed to the unvaccinated. Christine Stabell Benn observed:
“A vaccine that protects against malaria that does not reduce mortality makes no sense. We therefore asked GlaxoSmithKline for access to the original data and found that the vaccine reduced mortality among boys by a modest 15% while doubling the overall mortality rate for girls.’’
She added “This was the sixth non-live vaccine that we associated with increased mortality among girls – exactly as we had seen for other non-live vaccines,”
See https://www.sciencenews.dk/en/vaccines-an-unresolved-story-in-many-ways
The researchers published their findings, but to no avail. As of 2020 WHO is, regardless of any ethical or safety concerns, administering the vaccine to 720,000 children in Malawi, Ghana and Kenya over the next two years.
Weijer argues that by just showing up for a vaccination is no indication that a child and a parent has offered consent to test a new medication.
“Implied consent is no consent at all,” Weijer said. “There is no assurance that parents attended an information meeting about the malaria vaccine, let alone that they understood it.”
How can the average mother in Malawi, Ghana or Kenya, the vast majority of whom will have very little education in the ways of profiteering governments and pharmaceutical cartels, be expected to make an informed consent? They are unlikely to have access to the internet, and if they do have access will have their access entirely controlled by Google, who we know now to be heavily involved in the control of all vaccine information, deleting any contrary narrative or established concerns as misinformation, disinformation or conspiracy theory....?
One thing is for certain they won’t come across Aaby and Stabell Ben’s report.
Of course no one expects these mothers to make an Informed Consent. They are only required to provide Implied Consent by turning up for the vaccine to be administered – like the proverbial lambs to the slaughter.
This distinction between Informed and Implied consent is of course a crucial distinction not just for mothers in Ghana, Kenya and Malawi but for citizens across the globe who are all being treated in precisely the same way with reference to the COVID19 Vaccine.
Anybody who had any access to the true information concerning the COVID vaccines and the entirely experimental nature of the technology involved (particular ref the mRNA vaccines) anybody who was truly informed would have nothing to do with it. But very, very few are truly informed, through no fault of their own. The vast propaganda machine that is the government controlled media has labelled all real information concerning the COVID vaccine as misinformation, disinformation or conspiracy theory.
The plight of the mothers in Africa with regard to the malaria vaccine is now the plight of the global citizenry.
It is perfectly clear that the WHO and its associated NGO’s give not a fig for the concerns raised by anybody about anything they have set their sights on. They seem to think because they have the title World Health Organisation, because they have funding of billions from the likes of Bill Gates they have a mandate to do precisely as they please - regardless of how many lives they destroy.
DTP VACCINE
In 2017 a study entitled was published on PubMed that examined the introduction of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) and oral polio vaccine (OPV) in an urban community in Guinea-Bissau in the early 1980s. The conclusion of this study was unequivocal. Those children receiving the DTP vaccine had a five fold greater likelihood of dying that those children that didn’t have the vaccine. The conclusion read ‘DTP was associated with increased mortality’. This statement was qualified with the reassuring comment ‘OPV may modify the effect of DTP’....that is there may be slightly less mortality if the DTP is given with the oral polio vaccine
No doubt the conclusion of the WHO was ‘That’s OK then - we’ll give ‘em the OPV polio vaccine (responsible for spreading polio throughout the African continent) and we may reduce the fatality ratio for DTP – never mind that we may paralyse a few kids along the way.....’
This was the work of a highly respected Dutch virologist Peter Aaby, who revealed the fraudulent nature of the malaria vaccine. Once again Aaby, who was so appalled by what he found, broke all the rules of engagement for a paid up member of the vaccine industry and went public with his findings.
When I first came across Peter Aaby I assumed he must be the darling of the vaccine industry for he was announcing there were many non specific effects of vaccines that from his early research indicated were beneficial for Mankind, increasing general immunity to other diseases than the one being vaccinated against.
But Peter Aaby is nobody’s poodle. He is equally fearless in announcing when these non specific effects are having a deleterious effect. His researches in Africa concerning the DTP vaccine are a case in point. Aaby went public, was conspicuous and vocal in revealing what he considered to be extremely damaging evidence that the DTP vaccine was contributing to mortality in children, and particularly girls, by orders of magnitude.
See: "MOST OF YOU THINK WE KNOW WHAT OUR VACCINES ARE DOING – WE DON'T" - PETER AABY (2019)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kncohD7yWIc
If you look Aaby up on Wikipedia you will find no mention of the details of his research findings. Because of course we are not supposed to know that vaccines are killing people. The article concludes with this particularly good example of bureaucratic flim flam: WHO recently reviewed the evidence for non-specific effects of BCG vaccine, measles vaccine and DTP vaccine, and concluded that it would "keep a watch on the evidence of nonspecific effects of vaccination".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Aaby
Well that’s OK then. I remember once discovering when I was living in London that there was a regulation concerning the introduction of pedestrian crossings on dangerous roads in the area I lived, whereby the local council would only consider such measures after sufficient proof of fatality at that particular spot. In other words they wouldn’t even consider expending the money necessary to ensure the safety of pedestrians until what they considered a critical number of people had died.
It seems to me the WHO’s response to Aaby’s research is no different
All this really means is that if the shit ever really hit the fan the WHO has covered its arse. Meanwhile UNICEF and WHO see no reason to roll back the DTP vaccination programme. Far from it. We must continue full steam ahead to ensure the public good and beat these terrible diseases.................
Of course Aaby has been discredited in the usual way – a smear and hate campaign. UNICEF chose to disregard the data and continued roll out the DTP vaccine.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28188123
POLIO VACCINE
For example: according to New York City Department of Health director Dr. Morris Greenberg, polio fatalities decreased by nearly 90 percent from 1915 to 1955, before the polio vaccine was available to the public in 1955 (Howard Hillemann, in Clinical Physiology 2:2, 1960). How can we truly say, then, that vaccination got rid of polio?
Toronto medical doctor William McCormick and Dr. Fred Klenner of North Carolina, also an M.D., both prevented and treated the childhood infectious diseases with large quantities of Vitamin C. Again in Medical Record (September 1947) Dr. McCormick shows a direct relation between these diseases and vitamin C deficiency. If vitamin C deficiency is the real cause of these illnesses, what are we doing emphasizing inoculations?’’ See http://www.doctoryourself.com/vaccin_2.html
In its document Immunization Agenda 2030 the WHO states ref Polio:
The continuing challenges in interrupting the transmission of wild poliovirus and circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus outbreaks in countries that had been declared polio-free demonstrate the importance of strong immunization programmes as part of primary health care in reaching and sustaining global eradication. (my italics)
See https://www.who.int/teams/immunization-vaccines-and-biologicals/strategies/ia2030
for World Immunization Agenda 2030
Can anybody explain to me the logic - or rather absence of - in this sentence?
In order to combat the circulating vaccine derived poliovirus outbreaks we need to increase our vaccine coverage...........or let me put it another way:
‘We have introduced polio virus into the population with our vaccines and now it is imperative that we combat the polio that we have introduced by instigating more vaccines to ensure we do the job properly....’???
Clearly not enough children have been crippled.
If you were the parent of a child crippled by polio that was given to him or her by a vaccine would you be willing to take your crippled child or any other children you may have along for another vaccine? If you were the friend of a mother of a child suffering from vaccine induced polio would you be willing to take your child to be given the same vaccine that has crippled your friend’s child?
I think not. If you did you’d need to be certified insane.
There are two types of polio vaccine. One is by injection the other is oral – administered by droplets in the mouth. The oral vaccine is a great deal cheaper than the injected form. It is also a great deal less safe. It is this OPV that continues to be rolled out across the Third World – because it’s cheap
In 2000 Bill Gates arrived in India. Promising to eradicate Polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India ‘s National Advisory Board (NAB) and mandated 50 polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5.
Between 2000 and 2017 when the Indian government finally called time. According to India’s National Polio Surveillance Project a grand total of in excess of 490,000 serious adverse events, principally symptoms of polio, including death were reported from this heroic attempt to exterminate polio
Maybe you think this can be excused by ‘Oh we didn’t know what we were doing. We didn’t realise the full extent of the problem until all the figures were in....’
But 490,000 in 17 years is an awful lot to dismiss; an average of 28,823.5 severe adverse events reported per year...The fact is it was already known in 2000 that there were serious issues with the OPV vaccine. In 2000 it was discontinued in the USA. In 2004 it was discontinued in the UK.
Yet in India it continued to be administered up until 2017.
In that same year the WHO was forced to admit a new outbreak in the Sudan was caused by the oral vaccine. Apparently the vaccine virus had mutated into something now to be called as Vaccine Derived Polio Virus..(VDPV)
Do you think it makes any difference to a child suffering from polio whether it’s called Polio or Vaccine Derived Polio Virus?
The official line was it was caused by vaccine hesitancy. That is it was only affecting those who had not had the vaccine and was being acquired from those who had had the vaccine.
Now you might think well surely the sensible thing would be to stop giving the vaccine altogether? If it is the case, as we are told, that the wild strain of the virus has been eradicated and the only circulating virus is derived from the vaccine then the obvious thing surely would be to remove the cause of the circulating virus - namely the vaccine?
But oh no! This is far too obvious. Far too simple. Far too rational. And anyway it would mean the loss of millions in revenue.
So what story shall we give the idiot people this time? I know - let’s tell them the only reason they’ve caught the virus is that we introduced into your community is because you haven’t been vaccinated! The conclusion must be it’s not less vaccinating we need to do – but more. And this is a very convenient way of growing your business exponentially over night. Because now those who have not been vaccinated are given the idea that they have to live in fear and trembling of those that have had the vaccine from whom they may acquire the disease – which was supposedly long ago eradicated by the vaccine. Now those who have not had the vaccine are blamed for the spread of the disease.
But THIS IS ABSURD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It’s worse than absurd. It’s a crime against humanity. And needs to be called out for what it is rather than pussy footing around it.
The ONLY blame for the prevalence of polio in the Sudan in 2017 is the vaccine manufacturers who have introduced the disease into the population through their vaccine
The fact of the matter is the OPV vaccine contains an attenuated (weakened) vaccine virus which is supposed to activate an immune response in the body when the child is immunized. We are told by the CDC the weakened vaccine virus replicates in the intestine for a limited period. I’d like to know how limited.
Let’s state it as it is. The real problem is the virus does not die after the body has supposedly become immune. It grows stronger. Those who have had the vaccine develop identical symptoms to those who have been infected by the original wild virus. In a question and answer section of the CDC’s website the question is asked
Is there a difference in a disease caused by VDPV and one caused by wild poliovirus or OPV?
And the answer is:
‘No, there is no difference, between the paralysis caused by wild poliovirus, OPV or VDPV.
There you have it in a nutshell. If you can’t catch the wild virus, line up for the OPV vaccination and you never know you might get lucky and failing that rely on the fact that those that have had the OPV will be shedding it all over the place and if you haven’t yet managed to contract it you certainly will now.
Eventually
On the WHO’s website it used to state:
‘On rare occasions if a population is seriously under immunized an excreted vaccine virus can continue to circulate for an extended period of time. The longer it is allowed to survive, the more genetic changes it undergoes. In very rare instances the vaccine virus can genetically change into a form that can paralyse. This is what is known as circulating vaccine derived poliovirus CVDPV’
https://web.archive.org/web/20211105191457/ https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail
(Note this is only available on the Wayback Machine now)
And this is caused by ‘Mutated polio strains inside the vaccine’
This is confirmation of the self evident fact that vaccines can all too easily and all too often do cause disease
In 2020 with great pomp and ceremony it was announced that the wild strain of poliovirus had been eradicated from Africa. At the same time a severe warning was issued of the high risk of the further spread of the vaccine derived polio virus across Central Africa and the Horn of Africa, ‘noting the large side population movements’ in the region
So let’s look at who is at fault according to the WHO
1 Those who have not had the vaccine
2 Those populations who have the temerity to travel
Does this ring any bells to anybody alive anywhere in the globe in 2021...????
So the solution according to the WHO is to ensure every child under the age of 5 receives the same vaccine that has caused the rampant spread of the disease in the first place - in order to achieve herd immunity. And guess what? When people start to drop like flies or become incapacitated and paralysed it’ll be nothing to do with the vaccine. It’ll be a new mutation. And guess what? This mutation will require another vaccine. And so on and so on and so on ad infinitum...
So what we are confronted with is a revolving door of perpetual disease – a perpetual cycle of problem reaction solution. We introduce a disease. We give it a name. We tell you it’s incurable. We offer prophylaxis and we offer treatment and we tell you you’ve got to have it because we’ve got to sign you up for life because that’s what our business model says we’ve got to do. And since you’re stupid enough to swallow it hook line and sinker we have carte blanche to keep making you sick ad infinitum and then offer you the solution which we know perfectly well will only make you more sick, requiring more drugs, more treatments, more surgeries, more pain, more suffering.
You see we know perfectly well it’s all a sham. We know perfectly well that the only clue to good health is good nutrition, good air, good water, clean living conditions, hygiene, sanitation, economic stability, self determination, good opportunities, hope for the future. But since you have none of that you’re easy fodder. We can move in on you whenever we want with our ‘philanthropy’. And you’ll gobble it up because you believe what you’re told – that it’s going to give you a better life that it’s going to give you better health. And when it doesn’t and when the only thing you have that really matters – your children - when your children become sick and paralysed and keel over and die and when you’ve got nothing left, and when your own health has collapsed as a result of their ‘philanthropy’ what is there left for you....?
And we’re going to move in on your ability to be self determining as well. We’re going to take over your agriculture and your industry. We’re going to ensure you can never climb out of the poverty trap you were born into.
HEALTH IS NOT IN THE END OF A NEEDLE.
HEALTH IS NOT SOMETHING YOU ACQUIRE BY AVOIDING DISEASE.
HEALTH IS YOUR NATURAL BORN BIRTHRIGHT.
NOT DISEASE.
And what has the medical profession been doing for decades now? Ensuring that disease is your natural birthright.
Starting from the day you are born you are injected with disease. And recently this has taken on a whole new dimension.
Because now we have the mRNA vaccine designed according to Bill Gates to turn you into a vaccine manufacturing factory when what he actually means is turn you into a disease manufacturing factory.
Every living creature meets health challenges. Only humans go to doctors.
How does the animal kingdom cope with its health challenges: with rest, sleep and nutrition.
There is no health condition dreamt up by man that cannot be tackled with nutrition. And the extraordinary thing is science knows this. We know it. We know the nutritional answer to every disease that has ever been created by Man.
See http://www.doctoryourself.com
to find out how there is no disease known to man cannot be treated with nutrition
If the philanthropists in Africa were truly philanthropists they would be building the infrastructure for the indigenous people to build a quality of life for themselves, they would be assisting them to break out of the poverty trap by giving them the means to run their businesses, to manage their land to produce for themselves the nutrition to keep them well.
EF Schumacher knew this better than any
See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lb-OaI0w0cw The Other Way.
Schumacher came into public consciousness with a book called Small is Beautiful. The title says it all. He saw precisely the way the world was headed. He saw that the greatest enemy to human survival health and well being was giganticism. He argued for what he called an intermediate technology, whereby you give the poor people sufficient technology to manage their own resources rather than training them to use ridiculously advanced technology that could only serve the corporate industrial complex where the individual gets totally swallowed up
Of course he was ignored; because the last thing the corporate industrial technocracy wants is that the peoples of the third world learn to manage their own resources. For the simple reason that the only aim of the corporate industrial technocracy is to appropriate the resources of the third world. Henry Kissinger had made this perfectly plain in his 1974 report.
But Schumacher was right; and we need to revisit him. The world needs to revisit him. And understand that all we are doing – and have been doing for the last 50 years and more - is building a dystopian future for ourselves, our children and our grandchildren, a dystopian future that no one is going to want to live in.
See: Small Is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered (Vintage classics) Paperback – 16 Sept. 1993
See also:
A Guide For the Perplexed Paperback – 19 Oct. 1995 by E F Schumacher (Author) Vintage Classics
The world is presented with an existential crisis unparalleled in human history. The difference between the cataclysms that have afflicted the Earth in former millennia and what confronts us now is that this is human made. And it indicates the extent to which we’ve got it wrong; the extent to which we have failed to live as we are supposed to live; the extent to which we have allowed rampant materialism to rob us of our heritage.
One can only conclude from all of the above that Black Lives Matter so long as they’re comfortably ensconced in the industrialised western world but when in the land of their fathers they are totally expendable.