Dear MP, There are multiple issues concerning the government’s handling of the current (so called) health crisis that I could address but I am writing to address just one of them, and that is the imminent roll out of a vaccine for COVID-19.
The thing that concerns me most is the government's attitude to anyone who has legitimate concerns regarding the safety, efficacy, or even necessity, of the proposed vaccine, and the rampant censorship that pertains of all alternative narratives. It is of the essence of being human to ask questions and it is incomprehensible to me that citizens are not being permitted to ask questions concerning a procedure for which there is no sound scientific justification, a procedure that may very well be mandated for all citizens in the near future.
The government's position seems to be that 'the science is settled' concerning vaccination, this in spite of the fact in 1986, the Supreme Court in the USA ruled in Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, that vaccines are an "unavoidably unsafe" product.
The fact that the government is clearly aware of the risks involved is evidenced by the contract made recently by MHRA with GenPact UK for an 'AI software tool to process the expected high volume of COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR's)'. The MHRA apparently told the Financial Times that 'based on historical vaccination data, it is expecting between 50,000 and 100,000 ADR reports for every 100 million doses delivered to patients over a six to 12 month period.' https://pharmaphorum.com/news/mhra-looks-to-ai-to-hunt-for-covid-19-vaccine-side-effects
Is this acceptable?
The Prime Minister has made clear his view that Anti-Vaxxers are in his word 'nuts'. Unfortunately, in this he displays his ignorance. It is interesting to me that he commenced his assault on Anti Vaxxers at his presentation to the UN in September 2019, a speech in which he appeared to make an impassioned plea against the rise of Technocracy and the Orwellian dystopia that looms for all of us. In this context his attack on anti Vaxxers seemed a strange non sequitur, which makes me wonder if he knew something then that we the citizens have not been a party to.....
The concerns that I have pertaining to the proposed vaccines for COVID19 are as follows:
1 Immunity from liability is a license to print money for the vaccine manufacturers, and also therefore a license to forego the rigorous testing concerning safety and efficacy, which should be a prime concern when rolling out vaccinations to a large proportion of the population.
It would appear the UK government is now following in the footsteps of the USA where the 1986 Vaccine Act and the 2005 P.R.E.P Act combined to ‘afford vaccine manufacturers almost blanket liability protection from damages for vaccine harms’.
2 In spite of assertions to the contrary the science is most definitely not settled when it comes to vaccines. The whole concept of vaccination is based on Germ Theory. Since the discovery of the Microbiome Germ Theory no longer makes sense, and science, beyond the limited purview of the vaccine manufacturers, has been forced to acknowledge that germs and viruses are not the enemy to be eradicated, but are in fact the foundation of organic life. The notion that it is possible to eradicate a single pathogen with a vaccine schedule is about as antiquated as the notion that planet Earth is flat.
See https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/why-everything-you-learned-about-viruses-is-wrong
3 There has recently been a big push to promote the flu vaccine. I draw your attention to the known inefficacy of the flu vaccine – confirmed by a study of the Cochrane Collaboration in 2010. See https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD001269.pub4/full?cookiesEnabled
Also, since influenza is proven to be host specific the notion of a single therapeutic agent to combat it seems inappropriate to say the least.
See https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25226414
There seems to be a suggestion that the elderly should subscribe to the flu vaccination. The notion that the flu vaccination reduced mortality in the elderly was roundly trounced by a study in 2005. See https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/486407
4 I draw your attention to the danger of pathogenic priming – which has been comprehensively documented in previous attempts to create a coronavirus vaccine. I urge the government to do its research into this issue as a matter of due diligence
See https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32292901
5 I draw your attention to the research that has already concluded that to receive the flu vaccine is to automatically increase your chances of susceptibility to coronavirus by 36%, so to be administering both the flu and an unlicensed COVID vaccine at one and the same time would seem to be extremely inadvisable.
See: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X19313647?via%3Dihub
6 I draw your attention to the fact that receipt of any vaccine automatically increases susceptibility to other pathogens – a concept known as viral interference. This was also highlighted in the Cochrane Report 2010:
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD001269.pub4/full
7 I draw your attention to the evidence that, far from containing disease, vaccines actually assist in spreading it. A study from January 18, 2018, in the Journal of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, PNAS, found that influenza vaccination actually increased transmission of the virus, with vaccinated individuals shedding more than six times as much aerosolized virus in their breath than unvaccinated individuals.
See https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798362
Therefore it is more than likely that a hastily produced vaccine will only compound and exacerbate the existing health crisis.
8 I draw your attention to the fact that Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR test being used routinely to test for COVID 19, was quite clear that the PCR is not a diagnostic test and should not be used to diagnose any illness. There are many scientists who question the reliability of RT-PCR as a diagnostic tool. Hence the current case-demic, largely caused by mass roll out of PCR testing, cannot be considered indicative of epidemic disease.
See: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eci.12801
9 I draw your attention to the fact there is growing evidence that the mortality rate occasioned by the socio economic and psychological devastation wreaked by mandatory instigation of lockdown is going to be vastly greater than that of the disease it is aimed to inhibit.
See https://www.aier.org/article/death-by-lockdown
10 Finally, I would like to know if the government plans to advise the population on the fact that the proposed vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna and other manufacturers incorporate an entirely new technology that has never been tested on human populations until now. I refer to the mrNA technology. The theory behind these vaccines is that when you inject the mRNA into your cells, it will stimulate your cells to manufacture their own viral protein. Bill Gates described it as ‘turning your body into its own vaccine manufacturing unit’, in other words it is designed to fundamentally alter the genetic code of the recipient’s body. Is this going to be made clear to the general public?
The mRNA COVID-19 vaccine will be the first of its kind. No mRNA vaccine has ever been licensed before, and researchers have already pointed out potential dangers:
“According to researchers at University of Pennsylvania and Duke University, mRNA vaccines have potential safety issues, including local and systemic inflammation and stimulation of auto-reactive antibodies and autoimmunity, as well as development of edema (swelling) and blood clots.”
See https://www.nature.com/articles/nrd.2017.243
No-one can say for sure what the outcomes will be of this technology. Is it responsible to be rolling it out at a time of global crisis? The history of mass roll outs of hastily conceived vaccines at times of health crisis is not encouraging:
In 1976 the US government implemented a mass vaccination campaign against the swine flu. 46 million Americans were vaccinated against the swine flu at that time. When adverse side effects began to appear the programme had to be discontinued after only 3 months. Over the next few years, thousands of Americans filed vaccine damage claims with the federal government. https://www.gao.gov/assets/140/132011.pdf
After the H1N1 swine flu of 2009, the ASO3-adjuvanted swine flu vaccine Pandemrix (a fast-tracked vaccine used in Europe but not in the U.S. during 2009-2010) was causally linked to childhood narcolepsy, which abruptly skyrocketed in several countries. It was reckoned the narcolepsy was as a result of unforeseen genetic alterations. https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/ese.16.26.19904-en
The devastating side effects of the Pandemrix vaccine should be instructive. No one anticipated a flu vaccine to have genetic consequences, yet it did. The mRNA vaccine is designed to have genetic consequences, so this time these are guaranteed. What nobody knows or can predict is the collateral damage that may ensue...
As things stand it is impossible to achieve any accurate assessment of the mortality rate for COVID 19, since the virus has never been isolated, either according to Koch’s, Rivers’ or any other Postulates, and clinicians and hospitals have been instructed, and in some cases incentivised, to label all mortalities demonstrating even the remotest symptoms of COVID 19 as being COVID 19, regardless of any co-morbidities or other possible cause of death, and with absolutely no scientific evidence of infection with COVID 19 .
Only when all the figures have been unscrambled will it become clear, from the overall mortality rate for this year of 2020, whether there was ever any justification for the extreme measure taken – most notably the rolling out across a population of millions of an unlicensed vaccine for which manufacturers have no liability.
Of course given the concerns outlined above the final mortality figures will need to take into account the collateral damage pertaining to the combination of inevitably increased flu vaccine uptake combined with the unlicensed COVID 19 vaccine, and the immense damage resulting from lockdown impositions.
The notion of enforced medical procedures under any circumstances is abhorrent. The notion of enforced medical procedures that have not been tested for safety and efficacy smacks of fascism. Effectively the population is being used as guinea pigs.
Should you be interested in researching further the issues raised in this letter concerning safety and efficacy of vaccines I highly recommend visiting www.childrenshealthdefense.org. This is the website of Senator Robert F Kennedy, nephew to the former American President, who has made it his mission to alert the world to the dangers inherent in the current vaccine schedule. Every single assertion made is referenced to a scientific study or report. After perusal it would not be possible to come away with the notion that ‘the science is settled’ concerning vaccines - as governments and the media would have the public believe.
Finally I draw your attention to an article in the British Medical Journal this week:
'Politicisation of science was enthusiastically displayed by some of history's worst autocrats and dictators, and it is now regrettably commonplace in democracies. The medical political complex tends towards suppression of science to aggrandise and enrich those in power. And, as the powerful become more successful, richer and further intoxicated with power, the inconvenient truths of science are suppressed. When good science is suppressed people die.’
https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425
No member of my family will be receiving a COVID19 vaccine under any circumstances. If Mr Hancock's expressed intention of enforcing vaccination on children in school is realised I shall be withdrawing my children from school, which is not something I would normally contemplate doing. Nevertheless I shall not hesitate to do so should the COVID vaccine become mandatory.
I am aware that the democratic process has been all but abandoned in Westminster but I trust you will at least share these concerns since, in my view, they affect the health and safety of every man, woman and child in the country.
Yours sincerely
Jonathan Lewsey