Hippocrates v Hypocrite  



One of the most egregious things about the COVID19 Pandemic has been the demonization of all health information that is based on natural solutions rather than pharmaceutical solutions. Nowhere is this more blatant than with the publication of an Ant-Vaxx Playlist by The Centre for Countering Digital Hate.


The Centre for Countering Digital Hate and the Disinformation Dozen

Earlier this year an organisation called The Centre for Countering Digital Hate published an Anti-Vaxx Playbook claiming that just 12 individuals are responsible for spreading anti-vaxx information on social media, and calling for these individuals to be deplatformed.

The original 12 individuals are as follows. I supply the website addresses (for those who have websites) for you to click through and see for yourself if these individuals deserve to be classified along with political terrorists and purveyors of hate:


1 Dr Joseph Mercola https://www.mercola.com

2 Robert F Kennedy Children’s Health Defence https://childrenshealthdefense.org

3 Ty and Charlene Bollinger https://thetruthaboutvaccines.com

4 Sherri Tenpenny  https://www.drtenpenny.com

5 Rizza Islam

6 Rashid Buttar https://www.askdrbuttar.com/dr-buttar

7 Erin Elizabeth https://www.healthnutnews.com

8 Sayer Ji Greenmedinfo https://www.greenmedinfo.com

9 Kelly Brogan https://www.kellybroganmd.com

10 Christiane Northrup https://www.drnorthrup.com

11 Ben Tapper https://www.thewellnesspointe.com/dr-ben-tapper

12 Kevin Jenkins

To meet all of these doctors and make up your own minds as to whether these are dangerous criminals see:



Of all the Dozen the most pertinent in my view is Sayer Ji of Greenmedinfo. Because what this website https://www.greenmedinfo.com  makes clear is that the science is anything but settled. For every one assertion made by the medical profession there are ten others which are skirted round or ignored.

The science featured on Sayer Ji’s website is not just the science that is convenient to the members of SAGE or stakeholders in Pfizer, Moderna or Astra Zeneca. This is the science that reveals the dangers of vaccines, the data revealing actual harm to recipients and the data supporting the use of natural alternatives to pharmaceutical biologicals.



I was so outraged when I came across the Anti Vaxx Playbook I forthwith wrote to the CEO of The Centre for Countering Digital Hate, Imran Ahmed as follows:

Dear Mr Ahmed

I have just studied your Anti Vaxx Playbook and I have to say I am at a loss to know how this can possibly be published under the banner of Digital Hate...

Where is the hate in supplying information to people – information that is critical to allowing people to make an informed decision concerning a procedure which has been acknowledged by the Supreme Court in the USA as being ‘unavoidably unsafe’

Do people suffer severe reactions from vaccines? Yes.

Do people die subsequent to receiving vaccines? Yes.

This is not misinformation. It is information.

If the government was doing its job and providing the necessary information for people to make an informed decision on the safety or efficacy of vaccines there would be no need for the likes of RF Kennedy Jnr, Sayer Ji, Joseph Mercola and Sheri Tenpenny to be so vocal.

People want to know the truth. They are tired of being lied to.

The notion that health lies in the end of a needle in a supposedly civilized age is totally anachronistic. The common denominator amongst the health practitioners you seek to demonize is they all advocate that health is a matter for each sovereign individual to determine for him/herself.  This is a basic human right.

We are told to ‘listen to the science’. If you take the trouble to visit the websites of any of the health professionals on your hit list you will find abundant reference to scientific peer reviewed studies that totally contradict the official narrative being purveyed by governments across the globe.

Iatrogenic death is now the third leading cause of death in the Western world – that is deaths caused by medical malpractice. How many citizens know this when they engage with the medical profession? Don’t they deserve to know? Clearly not if you have a vested interest in that industry. If however  you have a disinterested concern for the well being of the human race then you would be advising the public of the risks to which they may be exposed and let them make their own determination.

When it comes to the fact that they are being asked to participate in a trial for a gene editing technology that has never been proven to be either safe or efficacious, which means you can have no clue as to the long term effects of the technology you are introducing, then it should be a fundamental ethical principle to alert the public there are risks attached.

The information being supplied by the activists you target is essential if citizens are to have any possibility of giving ‘informed consent’. Because the public is not being informed by the government.

All the general public is being told is that the vaccines being rolled out against COVID19 are ‘safe and effective’. The evidence mounting up by the day is that they are neither.

The greater good is not being served by allowing more people to die from the treatment than ever died from the disease you aim to treat. Unless of course you consider that the public good is only served by a draconian eugenicist policy aimed at reducing the global population. Who’s good is that? Certainly not those who die prematurely.

The attempt to consign any alternative narrative concerning vaccines to the dustbin of conspiracy theories gives clear and damning evidence of a conspiracy to hoodwink the public.

The only hate being purveyed when it comes to the subject of vaccines is coming from the CCDH.

To classify those who question the safety and efficacy of vaccines with political extremists, racists and hate criminals is iniquitous and convinces me there is an agenda driving this campaign which has nothing whatsoever to do with human health.

Your sincerely

Jonathan Lewsey


I hope Mr Ahmed received many such letters.

In a further Playbook entitled Pandemic Profiteers CCDH have added Andrew Wakefield, Barbara Loe Fisher, Larry Cook and Mike Adams to the list.

Barbara Loe Fisher is founder of:


https://www.nvic.org ,

an organisation that has worked tirelessly for decades to provide the information necessary for anybody to have a chance of giving informed consent when being offered a vaccine.


One of the founding principles of healthcare in a free society is Informed Consent.

Informed consent means what it says. It is consent given when in possession of ALL the available information – all the facts about whatever procedure it is being advocated. It is not possible for anyone to give informed consent if not in possession of all the facts.

The very principle of informed consent is in jeopardy when the public is told they don’t need access to all the facts but to leave it to the experts, the specialists, the professionals. Because be in doubt about it there is a vast discrepancy between the information being supplied to professionals and the information being supplied to the public.


This came home to me when in December 2020 I compared the Information for Health Professionals ref the Pfizer vaccine with the Information for UK Recipients. Basically the latter passes the responsibility to the former - to the healthcare professional. Are the healthcare professionals aware of this?


The following paragraphs from the original Information for Healthcare Professionals leapt out at me:


4.5 Interaction with other medicinal products and other forms of interaction

No interaction studies have been performed.


4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation


There are no or limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2.

Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine

BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy.

For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination. In addition, women of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose.



It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is excreted in human milk. A risk to

the newborns/infants cannot be excluded. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 should not be used

during breast-feeding.


It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility.


6.2 Incompatibilities

In the absence of compatibility studies, this medicinal product must not be mixed with other medicinal products.

See https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/997050/Temporary_Author

What is clear from the above is that when the Pfizer vaccine was first rolled out there were huge question marks over the product. Were the first recipients of the vaccine informed of these question marks?

Since that time 18,928 have been reported DEAD, 1.8 Million Injured (50% SERIOUS) by ‘The European Union’s Database of Adverse Drug Reactions for COVID-19 Shots’.

See  https://www.oom2.com/t76243-eudra-adverse-reaction-stats-though-july-17th-2021

In 1976 the disastrous swine flu vaccination campaign in America was halted after just 3 reported deaths and numerous instances of Guillaume Barre syndrome.......

See https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2009/04/28/the_great_swine_flu_epidemic_of_1976_212900.html

We are now in September - three months since I wrote the above. God knows what the figures are now...

And these are only the official figures. Reporting adverse events is made as difficult as possible and at a generous estimate this accounts for only 10% of the likely true extent of the casualties. A Harvard study conducted 2007-10 reckoned the likely figure was more like 1%.

See https://greatmountainpublishing.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Harvard-Vaccine-Injury-Study-Page-6-Reveals-1-Percent-Report-Rate.pdf

So multiply by 10 and then multiply by 10 again to get some sort of idea of the scale of the problem we face with the COVID Vaccine. At a conservative estimate that’s 190,000 dead in Europe alone. And that’s before you consider the side effects 50% of which are reckoned to be serious. A serious side effect is defined as follows:

“Seriousness provides information on the suspected undesirable effect; it can be classified as ‘serious’ if it corresponds to a medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalisation, results in another medically important condition, or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.”

You’d probably rather be dead than living with a serious ADR.

The fact of the matter is all the individuals on CCDH’s hit list are supplying the general public with the information that the WHO and the world’s governments is withholding from them. And this is why they are being demonised.

Here is a critical round table discussion including 5 of CCDH’s Disinformation Dozen and also including Robert F Kennedy and Del Bigtree. You will find a full transcript of the conversation. See if you think these individuals are purveying hate or if they are speaking out of a genuine concern for what is being perpetrated on the human population: