Skip to content


Somebody once said ‘there’s lies , damned lies and statistics – it wasn’t Disraeli.

It’s unarguable that statistics can be manipulated any way the statistician wants to manipulate them.

We saw the syndrome throughout the COVID era with the daily reports on how thousands of people were dying of COVID when actually they were dying of flu, neglect or Midazolam; how PCR was daily producing thousands of new cases of COVID – when a little research would show that PCR is not designed to diagnose anything; how the only people in the hospitals were the unvaccinated (a flagrant lie), how the unvaccinated were killing their children and killing Granny. All bollocks.

Statistics reflect the bias of the person using them.

But there’s one industry that has a vested interest in ensuring they interpret the statistics correctly, and that’s the Insurance industry. If they get it wrong they fail.

I was very struck early in 2021 by the testimony of Ed Dowd, former hedge fund manager for Black Rock, who performed a forensic analysis on death statistics in the COVID era and ultimately summarized his findings in a book entitled Cause Unknown: The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 & 2022, published a year ago in November 2022. Surprisingly it’s still available on Amazon.

The publisher’s blurb reads:

‘2020 saw a spike in deaths in America, smaller than you might imagine during a pandemic, some of which could be attributed to COVID and to initial treatment strategies that were not effective. But then, in 2021, the stats people expected went off the rails. The CEO of the OneAmerica insurance company publicly disclosed that during the third and fourth quarters of 2021, death in people of working age (18–64) was 40 percent higher than it was before the pandemic. Significantly, the majority of the deaths were not attributed to COVID.

A 40 percent increase in deaths is literally earth-shaking. Even a 10 percent increase in excess deaths would have been a 1-in-200-year event. But this was 40 percent.

And therein lies a story—a story that starts with obvious questions:

What has caused this historic spike in deaths among younger people?

What has caused the shift from old people, who are expected to die, to younger people, who are expected to keep living?

It isn’t COVID, of course, because we know that COVID is not a significant cause of death in young people. Various stakeholders opine about what could be causing this epidemic of unexpected sudden deaths, but “CAUSE UNKNOWN” doesn’t opine or speculate. The facts just are, and the math just is.

‘The book begins with a close look at the actual human reality behind the statistics, and when you see the people who are represented by the dry term Excess Mortality, it’s difficult to accept so many unexpected sudden deaths of young athletes, known to be the healthiest among us. Similarly, when lots of healthy teenagers and young adults die in their sleep without obvious reason, collapse and die on a family outing, or fall down dead while playing sports, that all by itself raises an immediate public health concern. Or at least it used to.

Ask yourself if you recall seeing these kinds of things occurring during your own life—in junior high? In high school? In college? How many times in your life did you hear of a performer dropping dead on stage in mid-performance? Your own life experience and intuition will tell you that what you’re about to see is not normal.
Or at least it wasn’t normal before 2021.’


Is this what they mean by the New Normal? If so it’s a sick joke.

In an interview with Naomi Wolfe for the Daily Clout in September this year Dowd referred to a concept common among Statisticians known as Standard Deviation – that is a deviation in any data set from what is recognised as being the norm. The chance of someone being hit by lightning during their entire lifetime would represent standard deviations of 3.8. If you think of how many people DON’T get hit by lightning – that is the vast majority of us – you can see that 3.8 standard deviation is HUGE. Dowd is finding standard deviations of 10.5 among the data sets he’s investigating, statistics that come from the ONS the Office of National Statistics in the UK. This is off the charts and could be said to be wholly IMPROBABLE.

Dowd has honed in on sudden cardiovascular death in the UK and has found

13% increase in 2020
30% increase in 2021
44% increase in 2022

He explains that these figures indicate signals so large that anybody with a practiced eye would find them IMPOSSIBLE to ignore. Dowd is seeing these signals across ALL the databases he’s investigating ALL the time.

Dowd points out that instances of sudden death are being dismissed as anecdotal, i.e. not statistically significant. What he’s saying as a statistician is that this is bollocks
. The signals are overwhelmingly significant and should be setting off alarm bells across all health authorities who, if they were doing their job, should be calling a halt to any novel medical intervention until such time as the signals have been explained and the cause of the signals addressed.


So the question we all have to ask ourselves is how many anecdotal events does it take before an anecdote becomes unassailable fact? Or to put it another way - how many more people have to die before somebody does something....?


In the last week alternative media has been full of the story of a New Zealand whistleblower, employed by the government to create payment systems for providers of COVID vaccines. Barry Young, like Ed Dowd, is a statistician – a data man. In the course of his work for the New Zealand government he repeatedly came across RED FLAG SAFETY SIGNALS that could not be ignored.

In an interview with lawyer and journalist Liz Gunn Mr Young explained his findings in a video that went viral. Young was specifically analysing batches of Pfizer vaccines. The underlying mortality rate in New Zealand should be only 0.75%, said Young. What he was seeing amongst recipients of the Pfizer jab was mortality rates ranging from 4.52% - 21.38%...
Young declares unequivocally the bottom line is this:


How can you ignore odds like that and still live with yourself....? Clearly Barry Young couldn’t.

Shortly after the interview went viral Barry Young was arrested. He was charged with “dishonestly accessing health data”. Note he was not charged with telling porkies....he was charged with accessing health data which he was paid to access in order to do his job...


As Andrew Bridgen has observed: ‘Why would NZ police arrest the whistleblowers if their evidence was debunked?’


Young has since been released from prison. In an interview with Alex Jones he made the following unassailable point:



And this is the whole point. The data doesn’t lie. The data only lies when it’s concealed or manipulated.

Yesterday I received in my email a report from Guy Hatchard entitled: ‘Korean Studies Indicate What Our Government is Hiding’


Dr Hatchard highlights three recent studies from South Korea on the harms caused by COVID injections. In light of the arrest of Barry Young Dr. Hatchard asks:

“Who do you believe? The researchers in Korea who have published analyses of millions of post-vaccination health records officially made available by their government or our government who are still refusing to make health records available whilst insisting that covid-19 vaccination is safe and effective?”


I received a letter from the NHS last week inviting me to line up for my COVID vaccine and informing me that the COVID vaccines are (and I quote) ‘proven to be safe’....


Whoever wrote that letter must know quite the opposite is the case:



No Trackbacks


Display comments as Linear | Threaded

No comments

Add Comment

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.

Form options