NOT SAFE AND EFFECTIVE....
Nobody has done more than JAMES ROGUSKI to try to alert the world to the peril in which it stands from the manoeuverings of the medical industrial complex to take control of the globe through medical fascism.
Last year Roguski's main concentration was to raise awareness of the impending Pandemic Treaty and proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, by which the Director of the World Health Organisation (WHO) would attain dictatorial powers over all nations on Earth should he see fit to announce a novel disease 'of international concern'.
Now Roguski has launched a website entitled NOT SAFE AND EFFECTIVE, and anybody who cares about the future of the human race should visit it. It can be found here:
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/not-safe-and-not-effective.
The webpage commences with a video in which Maria Zeee outlines how the introduction of the mRNA vaccines against COVID in 2021 was 'a gross act of bioterrorism', and how the health of the entire global population has been adversely affected, not to mention the millions of lives that have already been lost due to the adverse effects. The video includes interviews with medical professionals who explain in clear terms how there is no question that the mRNA vaccines, in the words of Dr Mike Yeadon, were 'deliberately designed to injure, kill and reduce fertility'.....
Dr Peter McCullough spells out the principle results of harm that he has witnessed - blood clotting leading to strokes and heart attacks and an explosion of turbo cancers...
See https://rumble.com/v62zapw-notsafeandnoteffective.com.html
Look around you. How many people do you know suffering from blood clotting problems, strokes, heart attacks and/or cancer...? And ask yourself has there ever been a time in your life when you have known so many of your friends and acquaintances be sick...? I certainly haven't. It's not normal. It's not acceptable.
And if you visit this website and explore all the resources on it you'll be forced to accept there is only one possible explanation....
See https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/not-safe-and-not-effective
The website includes a 3 page Executive Summary which I print below:
Executive Summary
COVID-19 modmRNA vaccines, particularly Pfizer-BioNTec's BNT162b2 (Comirnaty) and Moderna's
mRNA-1273 (Spikevax) utilize lipid nanoparticle-based delivery mechanisms to administer genetic
instructions for spike protein production. The rapid deployment of modmRNA vaccines without
adequate safety data represents a cautionary tale, highlighting the importance of rigorous scientific
inquiry and ethical considerations in protecting public health. Deeper scrutiny reveals substantial
concerns about safety, efficacy, data fraud, regulatory capture, and unacceptably large numbers of
serious adverse events and deaths attributed to these poorly designed and inadequately studied genebased biological weapons.
1. Natural Immunity and Early Treatment Was Ignored
• Natural immunity was found to confer more durable protection than vaccination, but this
fundamental truth was widely ingnored.
• Early treatment protocols showed promise in reducing severe outcomes, yet were largely
ignored in public health strategies.
2. Regulatory Standards, Ethical Norms and Fundamental Human Rights Were Violated
• Regulatory agencies and the Bio-Pharma Complex are accused of prioritizing profits
• over safety, leading to public mistrust. Regulatory agencies and manufacturers maintained close
ties, undermining the impartiality of safety assessments.
• The accelerated timelines, insufficient safety testing, and systemic bias in regulatory oversight
raise ethical and scientific concerns about the widespread use of these products.
• The reclassification of modmRNA products as “vaccines” allowed manufacturers to bypass
traditional safety testing protocols required for gene therapies.
• The Pfizer and Moderna trials spanned only 2-3 months, which is an insufficient amount of time
for capturing long-term safety and efficacy data.
• The methodology omitted or misrepresented critical safety data. Critical adverse events and
latency effects were likely missed due to these truncated timelines.
• Clinical trials showed increased risks of serious adverse events compared to placebo, but these
significant risks were hidden from the public.
• Publication bias and conflicts of interest have distorted the public understanding of vaccine risk.
• Policies mandating vaccination, including for children, are scientifically unfounded and
potentially harmful.
• Coercive mandates and inclusion of these vaccines in childhood immunization schedules are
unethical and scientifically unjustified.
• Informed consent processes were often inadequate, particularly given the novel nature of these
technologies.
• “Safe and effective” messaging persists to this day despite mounting evidence of significant
risks and documented harm. The downplaying of serious adverse events contributed to
widespread and well-founded public distruct of the government, medical profession and media.
• Manufacturing inconsistencies introduced genetic contaminants, compounding the potential for
adverse outcomes. Pfizer employed a bait and switch tactic in which the mass production of the
injectable products employed a production process that was dramatically different from the
process used to manufacture the products used in the clinical trials. The second process
introduced genetic impurities into the product, raising concerns over horrific health outcomes
for those who received the injections.
3. Design and Functional Flaws Were Ignored
• It is anatomically impossible for a substance that is injected into the arm to provide immunity to
a respiratory pathogen.
• Spike Protein Toxicity: The engineered spike protein's persistence and systemic distribution
have been implicated in adverse reactions, including autoimmune responses and endothelial
damage. The engineered spike protein can elicit cytotoxic effects, and persistent spike protein
production post-vaccination may lead to chronic health issues, including immune dysfunction
and systemic inflammation.
• Lipid Nanoparticle Delivery: The vaccines use lipid nanoparticles to deliver genetic instructions
for spike protein production. While this mechanism is novel, it also introduces unique risks, that
were inadequately assessed during development and rollout.
• Claims that nanoparticles remain localized to the injection site have been shown to be
fraudulent. Studies clearly show widespread biodistribution of the lipid nanoparticles and their
payloads circulate throughout the body leading to widespread biodistribution and prolonged
spike protein production throughout the body.
4. Poor Performance
• Initial efficacy claims (e.g., 95% relative risk reduction) were based on fraudulent definitions
and failed to even contemplate long-term outcomes.
• The modnRNA injections performed poorly with declining “protection” over time. Studies
indicate rapid waning of protection, with effectiveness against infection dropping to near zero
within 6 months post-vaccination. Increased rates of severe COVID-19 outcomes in heavily
vaccinated populations reveal negative vaccine efficacy. They offer no benefit.
• Natural immunity and early treatments were found to offer more robust protection, questioning
the necessity of mass vaccination.
• For low-risk groups such as children and young adults, the harm-to-benefit ratio of vaccination
appears unfavorable.
5. Adverse Events and Safety Concerns
The modmRNA vaccines are associated with a wide range of serious and potentially life-threatening
conditions, including thousands upon thousands of deaths.
A. Cardiovascular
• Elevated risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and acute coronary syndrome.
• Evidence suggests systemic spike protein persistence, contributing to endothelial damage and
thrombotic events.
• Reports of myocarditis, thrombotic events, and neurological issues suggest a disproportionate
harm-to-benefit ratio, especially in low-risk populations like children.
B. Neurological
• Reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome, seizures, and other neuroinflammatory conditions.
• Concerns over spike protein’s potential role in neurodegenerative diseases.
C. Hematologic
• Increased cases of thrombocytopenia and venous thromboembolism.
• Clotting disorders have been observed more frequently in vaccinated individual compared to
placebo groups.
D. Immunological
• Spike protein’s interaction with adaptive immunity has been implicated in autoimmune
reactions.
• Persistent inflammation and immune dysregulation has been reported.
E. Oncological
• Preliminary data suggest possible impacts on tumor suppressor pathways, necessitating further
investigation into cancer-related risks.
F. Reproductive
• Reports of menstrual irregularities, reduced fertility markers, and adverse outcomes in pregnant
women.
• Lack of controlled studies involving pregnant women or infants raises significant ethical
concerns.
6. Misrepresentation of Data
• Underreporting of serious adverse events (SAEs).
• Failure to include comprehensive follow-up data on participants who experienced significant
health issues.
• Failure to apply the proper ICD-10 codes to document the extent of harm caused by the mRNA
injections.
7. Recommendations
• Call for a GLOBAL BAN on mRNA products an immediate suspension of modmRNA vaccine
use. A halt on the research and development of modmRNA vaccines must be instituted.
• Long-term care for vaccine-injured individuals poses a significant challenge to healthcare
systems worldwide. Implementing robust compensation frameworks and focusing on preventive
measures for adverse effects are crucial.
• Greater transparency and adherence to rigorous safety standards for gene-based therapies must
be enforced. Future efforts smust prioritize transparency, accountability and universal and
absolute respect for individual rights.
• Natural immunity, early treatment protocols, and traditional approaches must be prioritized as
safer options. Interventions that do more harm than good must never be approved and
individuals must always be fully informed of potential risks and free to refuse any therapy.
• Facilitating open forums for discourse and providing alternative public health strategies could
help mend societal rifts.
• Whistleblower protections and independent auditing to ensure accountability must be
implemented.
• Public health reforms that prioritize human safety over commercial interests mjust become the
norm in public health policy.
Last year Roguski's main concentration was to raise awareness of the impending Pandemic Treaty and proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, by which the Director of the World Health Organisation (WHO) would attain dictatorial powers over all nations on Earth should he see fit to announce a novel disease 'of international concern'.
Now Roguski has launched a website entitled NOT SAFE AND EFFECTIVE, and anybody who cares about the future of the human race should visit it. It can be found here:
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/not-safe-and-not-effective.
The webpage commences with a video in which Maria Zeee outlines how the introduction of the mRNA vaccines against COVID in 2021 was 'a gross act of bioterrorism', and how the health of the entire global population has been adversely affected, not to mention the millions of lives that have already been lost due to the adverse effects. The video includes interviews with medical professionals who explain in clear terms how there is no question that the mRNA vaccines, in the words of Dr Mike Yeadon, were 'deliberately designed to injure, kill and reduce fertility'.....
Dr Peter McCullough spells out the principle results of harm that he has witnessed - blood clotting leading to strokes and heart attacks and an explosion of turbo cancers...
See https://rumble.com/v62zapw-notsafeandnoteffective.com.html
Look around you. How many people do you know suffering from blood clotting problems, strokes, heart attacks and/or cancer...? And ask yourself has there ever been a time in your life when you have known so many of your friends and acquaintances be sick...? I certainly haven't. It's not normal. It's not acceptable.
And if you visit this website and explore all the resources on it you'll be forced to accept there is only one possible explanation....
See https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/not-safe-and-not-effective
The website includes a 3 page Executive Summary which I print below:
Executive Summary
COVID-19 modmRNA vaccines, particularly Pfizer-BioNTec's BNT162b2 (Comirnaty) and Moderna's
mRNA-1273 (Spikevax) utilize lipid nanoparticle-based delivery mechanisms to administer genetic
instructions for spike protein production. The rapid deployment of modmRNA vaccines without
adequate safety data represents a cautionary tale, highlighting the importance of rigorous scientific
inquiry and ethical considerations in protecting public health. Deeper scrutiny reveals substantial
concerns about safety, efficacy, data fraud, regulatory capture, and unacceptably large numbers of
serious adverse events and deaths attributed to these poorly designed and inadequately studied genebased biological weapons.
1. Natural Immunity and Early Treatment Was Ignored
• Natural immunity was found to confer more durable protection than vaccination, but this
fundamental truth was widely ingnored.
• Early treatment protocols showed promise in reducing severe outcomes, yet were largely
ignored in public health strategies.
2. Regulatory Standards, Ethical Norms and Fundamental Human Rights Were Violated
• Regulatory agencies and the Bio-Pharma Complex are accused of prioritizing profits
• over safety, leading to public mistrust. Regulatory agencies and manufacturers maintained close
ties, undermining the impartiality of safety assessments.
• The accelerated timelines, insufficient safety testing, and systemic bias in regulatory oversight
raise ethical and scientific concerns about the widespread use of these products.
• The reclassification of modmRNA products as “vaccines” allowed manufacturers to bypass
traditional safety testing protocols required for gene therapies.
• The Pfizer and Moderna trials spanned only 2-3 months, which is an insufficient amount of time
for capturing long-term safety and efficacy data.
• The methodology omitted or misrepresented critical safety data. Critical adverse events and
latency effects were likely missed due to these truncated timelines.
• Clinical trials showed increased risks of serious adverse events compared to placebo, but these
significant risks were hidden from the public.
• Publication bias and conflicts of interest have distorted the public understanding of vaccine risk.
• Policies mandating vaccination, including for children, are scientifically unfounded and
potentially harmful.
• Coercive mandates and inclusion of these vaccines in childhood immunization schedules are
unethical and scientifically unjustified.
• Informed consent processes were often inadequate, particularly given the novel nature of these
technologies.
• “Safe and effective” messaging persists to this day despite mounting evidence of significant
risks and documented harm. The downplaying of serious adverse events contributed to
widespread and well-founded public distruct of the government, medical profession and media.
• Manufacturing inconsistencies introduced genetic contaminants, compounding the potential for
adverse outcomes. Pfizer employed a bait and switch tactic in which the mass production of the
injectable products employed a production process that was dramatically different from the
process used to manufacture the products used in the clinical trials. The second process
introduced genetic impurities into the product, raising concerns over horrific health outcomes
for those who received the injections.
3. Design and Functional Flaws Were Ignored
• It is anatomically impossible for a substance that is injected into the arm to provide immunity to
a respiratory pathogen.
• Spike Protein Toxicity: The engineered spike protein's persistence and systemic distribution
have been implicated in adverse reactions, including autoimmune responses and endothelial
damage. The engineered spike protein can elicit cytotoxic effects, and persistent spike protein
production post-vaccination may lead to chronic health issues, including immune dysfunction
and systemic inflammation.
• Lipid Nanoparticle Delivery: The vaccines use lipid nanoparticles to deliver genetic instructions
for spike protein production. While this mechanism is novel, it also introduces unique risks, that
were inadequately assessed during development and rollout.
• Claims that nanoparticles remain localized to the injection site have been shown to be
fraudulent. Studies clearly show widespread biodistribution of the lipid nanoparticles and their
payloads circulate throughout the body leading to widespread biodistribution and prolonged
spike protein production throughout the body.
4. Poor Performance
• Initial efficacy claims (e.g., 95% relative risk reduction) were based on fraudulent definitions
and failed to even contemplate long-term outcomes.
• The modnRNA injections performed poorly with declining “protection” over time. Studies
indicate rapid waning of protection, with effectiveness against infection dropping to near zero
within 6 months post-vaccination. Increased rates of severe COVID-19 outcomes in heavily
vaccinated populations reveal negative vaccine efficacy. They offer no benefit.
• Natural immunity and early treatments were found to offer more robust protection, questioning
the necessity of mass vaccination.
• For low-risk groups such as children and young adults, the harm-to-benefit ratio of vaccination
appears unfavorable.
5. Adverse Events and Safety Concerns
The modmRNA vaccines are associated with a wide range of serious and potentially life-threatening
conditions, including thousands upon thousands of deaths.
A. Cardiovascular
• Elevated risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and acute coronary syndrome.
• Evidence suggests systemic spike protein persistence, contributing to endothelial damage and
thrombotic events.
• Reports of myocarditis, thrombotic events, and neurological issues suggest a disproportionate
harm-to-benefit ratio, especially in low-risk populations like children.
B. Neurological
• Reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome, seizures, and other neuroinflammatory conditions.
• Concerns over spike protein’s potential role in neurodegenerative diseases.
C. Hematologic
• Increased cases of thrombocytopenia and venous thromboembolism.
• Clotting disorders have been observed more frequently in vaccinated individual compared to
placebo groups.
D. Immunological
• Spike protein’s interaction with adaptive immunity has been implicated in autoimmune
reactions.
• Persistent inflammation and immune dysregulation has been reported.
E. Oncological
• Preliminary data suggest possible impacts on tumor suppressor pathways, necessitating further
investigation into cancer-related risks.
F. Reproductive
• Reports of menstrual irregularities, reduced fertility markers, and adverse outcomes in pregnant
women.
• Lack of controlled studies involving pregnant women or infants raises significant ethical
concerns.
6. Misrepresentation of Data
• Underreporting of serious adverse events (SAEs).
• Failure to include comprehensive follow-up data on participants who experienced significant
health issues.
• Failure to apply the proper ICD-10 codes to document the extent of harm caused by the mRNA
injections.
7. Recommendations
• Call for a GLOBAL BAN on mRNA products an immediate suspension of modmRNA vaccine
use. A halt on the research and development of modmRNA vaccines must be instituted.
• Long-term care for vaccine-injured individuals poses a significant challenge to healthcare
systems worldwide. Implementing robust compensation frameworks and focusing on preventive
measures for adverse effects are crucial.
• Greater transparency and adherence to rigorous safety standards for gene-based therapies must
be enforced. Future efforts smust prioritize transparency, accountability and universal and
absolute respect for individual rights.
• Natural immunity, early treatment protocols, and traditional approaches must be prioritized as
safer options. Interventions that do more harm than good must never be approved and
individuals must always be fully informed of potential risks and free to refuse any therapy.
• Facilitating open forums for discourse and providing alternative public health strategies could
help mend societal rifts.
• Whistleblower protections and independent auditing to ensure accountability must be
implemented.
• Public health reforms that prioritize human safety over commercial interests mjust become the
norm in public health policy.