GUY HATCHARD: THE FUNDAMENTAL FLAW IN BIOTECH MEDICINE
In a recent article Doctor Guy Hatchard echoes the concerns raised by Peter Gariaev re the new class of gene editing medicines represented by the mRNA vaccines forced upon the general public throughout the COVID era (see previous entry)
Hatchard asks the important question:
Why is the entire class of biologic drugs so risky?
Biologics has for decades been the designation given to vaccines. Vaccines were given that designation to avoid the regulatory strictures that apply to medicines generally. Latterly vaccines have morphed into gene editing therapies that bear little resemblance to vaccines as originally conceived but still retain the same name. Hatchard answers his question thus:
‘This is a really important question. As we have explained previously, biotech medicines that cross the cell membrane inevitably interfere with the command and control processes that determine immunity and homeostasis. Unpack this a little more and you arrive at a fundamental characteristic of biologics. Gene therapies are built around the defensive and offensive properties of bacteria, viruses and enzymatic immune responses. Simply put, our physiology is a battleground between destructive and constructive forces. CRISPR gene editing techniques harness the destructive forces at play to set up gene editing opportunities. Other biologics insert themselves downstream of DNA to edit genetic processes’
See https://hatchardreport.media/pdf-files/the-fundamental-flaw-in-biotech-medicine.pdf
for the full article. It’s worth reading for it explains in layman’s term why ‘Biologics’ are so dangerous and why the fallout from the COVID vaccines has been so catastrophic.
The bottom line is this:
‘Gene editing is always going to be opposed to holistic health because it cannot take the health of the whole organism into account, instead it will instead disrupt it in specific ways.’
Hatchard asks the important question:
Why is the entire class of biologic drugs so risky?
Biologics has for decades been the designation given to vaccines. Vaccines were given that designation to avoid the regulatory strictures that apply to medicines generally. Latterly vaccines have morphed into gene editing therapies that bear little resemblance to vaccines as originally conceived but still retain the same name. Hatchard answers his question thus:
‘This is a really important question. As we have explained previously, biotech medicines that cross the cell membrane inevitably interfere with the command and control processes that determine immunity and homeostasis. Unpack this a little more and you arrive at a fundamental characteristic of biologics. Gene therapies are built around the defensive and offensive properties of bacteria, viruses and enzymatic immune responses. Simply put, our physiology is a battleground between destructive and constructive forces. CRISPR gene editing techniques harness the destructive forces at play to set up gene editing opportunities. Other biologics insert themselves downstream of DNA to edit genetic processes’
See https://hatchardreport.media/pdf-files/the-fundamental-flaw-in-biotech-medicine.pdf
for the full article. It’s worth reading for it explains in layman’s term why ‘Biologics’ are so dangerous and why the fallout from the COVID vaccines has been so catastrophic.
The bottom line is this:
‘Gene editing is always going to be opposed to holistic health because it cannot take the health of the whole organism into account, instead it will instead disrupt it in specific ways.’
Trackbacks
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as Linear | Threaded