The Disease of Modern Medicine Blog

Nobody has done more than JAMES ROGUSKI to try to alert the world to the peril in which it stands from the manoeuverings of the medical industrial complex to take control of the globe through medical fascism.

Last year Roguski's main concentration was to raise awareness of the impending Pandemic Treaty and proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, by which the Director of the World Health Organisation (WHO) would attain dictatorial powers over all nations on Earth should he see fit to announce a novel disease 'of international concern'.

Now Roguski has launched a website entitled NOT SAFE AND EFFECTIVE, and anybody who cares about the future of the human race should visit it. It can be found here:

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/not-safe-and-not-effective.

The webpage commences with a video in which Maria Zeee outlines how the introduction of the mRNA vaccines against COVID in 2021 was 'a gross act of bioterrorism', and how the health of the entire global population has been adversely affected, not to mention the millions of lives that have already been lost due to the adverse effects. The video includes interviews with medical professionals who explain in clear terms how there is no question that the mRNA vaccines, in the words of Dr Mike Yeadon, were 'deliberately designed to injure, kill and reduce fertility'.....

Dr Peter McCullough spells out the principle results of harm that he has witnessed - blood clotting leading to strokes and heart attacks and an explosion of turbo cancers...

See https://rumble.com/v62zapw-notsafeandnoteffective.com.html

Look around you. How many people do you know suffering from blood clotting problems, strokes, heart attacks and/or cancer...? And ask yourself has there ever been a time in your life when you have known so many of your friends and acquaintances be sick...? I certainly haven't. It's not normal. It's not acceptable.

And if you visit this website and explore all the resources on it you'll be forced to accept there is only one possible explanation....

See https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/not-safe-and-not-effective

The website includes a 3 page Executive Summary which I print below:

Executive Summary

COVID-19 modmRNA vaccines, particularly Pfizer-BioNTec's BNT162b2 (Comirnaty) and Moderna's
mRNA-1273 (Spikevax) utilize lipid nanoparticle-based delivery mechanisms to administer genetic
instructions for spike protein production. The rapid deployment of modmRNA vaccines without
adequate safety data represents a cautionary tale, highlighting the importance of rigorous scientific
inquiry and ethical considerations in protecting public health. Deeper scrutiny reveals substantial
concerns about safety, efficacy, data fraud, regulatory capture, and unacceptably large numbers of
serious adverse events and deaths attributed to these poorly designed and inadequately studied genebased biological weapons.

1. Natural Immunity and Early Treatment Was Ignored

• Natural immunity was found to confer more durable protection than vaccination, but this
fundamental truth was widely ingnored.
• Early treatment protocols showed promise in reducing severe outcomes, yet were largely
ignored in public health strategies.

2. Regulatory Standards, Ethical Norms and Fundamental Human Rights Were Violated

• Regulatory agencies and the Bio-Pharma Complex are accused of prioritizing profits
• over safety, leading to public mistrust. Regulatory agencies and manufacturers maintained close
ties, undermining the impartiality of safety assessments.
• The accelerated timelines, insufficient safety testing, and systemic bias in regulatory oversight
raise ethical and scientific concerns about the widespread use of these products.
• The reclassification of modmRNA products as “vaccines” allowed manufacturers to bypass
traditional safety testing protocols required for gene therapies.
• The Pfizer and Moderna trials spanned only 2-3 months, which is an insufficient amount of time
for capturing long-term safety and efficacy data.
• The methodology omitted or misrepresented critical safety data. Critical adverse events and
latency effects were likely missed due to these truncated timelines.
• Clinical trials showed increased risks of serious adverse events compared to placebo, but these
significant risks were hidden from the public.
• Publication bias and conflicts of interest have distorted the public understanding of vaccine risk.
• Policies mandating vaccination, including for children, are scientifically unfounded and
potentially harmful.
• Coercive mandates and inclusion of these vaccines in childhood immunization schedules are
unethical and scientifically unjustified.
• Informed consent processes were often inadequate, particularly given the novel nature of these
technologies.
• “Safe and effective” messaging persists to this day despite mounting evidence of significant
risks and documented harm. The downplaying of serious adverse events contributed to
widespread and well-founded public distruct of the government, medical profession and media.
• Manufacturing inconsistencies introduced genetic contaminants, compounding the potential for
adverse outcomes. Pfizer employed a bait and switch tactic in which the mass production of the
injectable products employed a production process that was dramatically different from the
process used to manufacture the products used in the clinical trials. The second process
introduced genetic impurities into the product, raising concerns over horrific health outcomes
for those who received the injections.

3. Design and Functional Flaws Were Ignored

• It is anatomically impossible for a substance that is injected into the arm to provide immunity to
a respiratory pathogen.
• Spike Protein Toxicity: The engineered spike protein's persistence and systemic distribution
have been implicated in adverse reactions, including autoimmune responses and endothelial
damage. The engineered spike protein can elicit cytotoxic effects, and persistent spike protein
production post-vaccination may lead to chronic health issues, including immune dysfunction
and systemic inflammation.
• Lipid Nanoparticle Delivery: The vaccines use lipid nanoparticles to deliver genetic instructions
for spike protein production. While this mechanism is novel, it also introduces unique risks, that
were inadequately assessed during development and rollout.
• Claims that nanoparticles remain localized to the injection site have been shown to be
fraudulent. Studies clearly show widespread biodistribution of the lipid nanoparticles and their
payloads circulate throughout the body leading to widespread biodistribution and prolonged
spike protein production throughout the body.

4. Poor Performance

• Initial efficacy claims (e.g., 95% relative risk reduction) were based on fraudulent definitions
and failed to even contemplate long-term outcomes.
• The modnRNA injections performed poorly with declining “protection” over time. Studies
indicate rapid waning of protection, with effectiveness against infection dropping to near zero
within 6 months post-vaccination. Increased rates of severe COVID-19 outcomes in heavily
vaccinated populations reveal negative vaccine efficacy. They offer no benefit.
• Natural immunity and early treatments were found to offer more robust protection, questioning
the necessity of mass vaccination.
• For low-risk groups such as children and young adults, the harm-to-benefit ratio of vaccination
appears unfavorable.

5. Adverse Events and Safety Concerns

The modmRNA vaccines are associated with a wide range of serious and potentially life-threatening
conditions, including thousands upon thousands of deaths.
A. Cardiovascular
• Elevated risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and acute coronary syndrome.
• Evidence suggests systemic spike protein persistence, contributing to endothelial damage and
thrombotic events.
• Reports of myocarditis, thrombotic events, and neurological issues suggest a disproportionate
harm-to-benefit ratio, especially in low-risk populations like children.
B. Neurological
• Reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome, seizures, and other neuroinflammatory conditions.
• Concerns over spike protein’s potential role in neurodegenerative diseases.
C. Hematologic
• Increased cases of thrombocytopenia and venous thromboembolism.
• Clotting disorders have been observed more frequently in vaccinated individual compared to
placebo groups.
D. Immunological
• Spike protein’s interaction with adaptive immunity has been implicated in autoimmune
reactions.
• Persistent inflammation and immune dysregulation has been reported.
E. Oncological
• Preliminary data suggest possible impacts on tumor suppressor pathways, necessitating further
investigation into cancer-related risks.
F. Reproductive
• Reports of menstrual irregularities, reduced fertility markers, and adverse outcomes in pregnant
women.
• Lack of controlled studies involving pregnant women or infants raises significant ethical
concerns.

6. Misrepresentation of Data

• Underreporting of serious adverse events (SAEs).
• Failure to include comprehensive follow-up data on participants who experienced significant
health issues.
• Failure to apply the proper ICD-10 codes to document the extent of harm caused by the mRNA
injections.

7. Recommendations

• Call for a GLOBAL BAN on mRNA products an immediate suspension of modmRNA vaccine
use. A halt on the research and development of modmRNA vaccines must be instituted.
• Long-term care for vaccine-injured individuals poses a significant challenge to healthcare
systems worldwide. Implementing robust compensation frameworks and focusing on preventive
measures for adverse effects are crucial.
• Greater transparency and adherence to rigorous safety standards for gene-based therapies must
be enforced. Future efforts smust prioritize transparency, accountability and universal and
absolute respect for individual rights.
• Natural immunity, early treatment protocols, and traditional approaches must be prioritized as
safer options. Interventions that do more harm than good must never be approved and
individuals must always be fully informed of potential risks and free to refuse any therapy.
• Facilitating open forums for discourse and providing alternative public health strategies could
help mend societal rifts.
• Whistleblower protections and independent auditing to ensure accountability must be
implemented.
• Public health reforms that prioritize human safety over commercial interests mjust become the
norm in public health policy.

.
As we enter 2025 the half way point in this decade supposedly leading us inexorably forward to the target year of 2030 designated by the UN for the implementation of Agenda21/30, the Great Reset, the Singularity, the Fourth Industrial Revolution or whichever other Psyop you subscribe to, I thought it would be timely to visit some old friends whose voices I have come to trust implicitly over the last 4 years. First of these is Dr Mile Yeadon.


DR MIKE YEADON, former Vice President at Pfizer has never wavered in his warnings about the fraudulent nature of the whole COVID Psyop. As a lifetime industry professional he is better qualified than any to comment on the nature of the COVID ‘vaccines’, and vaccines generally. Yeadon has undoubtedly been on a journey himself over the last four years, questioning many long cherished beliefs and coming to some disturbing conclusions.

In an article entitled: "Please Don’t Allow Your Children to Be Injected With Useless, Unnecessary and Potentially Harmful Substances." Yeadon has provided one of the clearest, most succinct demolitions of germ theory and the nonsense surrounding vaccines that I have come across. I have highlighted what I believe is the crux of the matter in Yeadon’s open letter:

‘Someone recently asked me about vaccinating her child. My answer is below.....

‘Dear xxxx,

Until 2020, like an idiot, fully programmed by propaganda, I would have unhesitatingly have recommended that children receive all recommended vaccines. I had not done my research. I trusted the government and doctors.

I spent my career in pharmaceutical R&D, though I had no connections to the vaccines division, fortunately for them as well as me.

Since 2020, I have realised that the entire field of virology is, believe it or not, fraudulent. Illnesses attributed to a wide range of scary sounding viruses are real. Measles exist. Mumps exists. Rubella exists.

Here’s the key thing, though. None of them are caused by submicroscopic, infectious particles called “viruses”. There’s no scientific evidence for their existence.

Consider this. When you have a headache, perhaps a migraine, do you ask yourself “Where did I catch this headache from?” If you’re unlucky enough to have chest pain on mild exertion, can you imagine questioning “From whom did I catch this dose of angina?”

If a family member saw you in distress, suffering a migraine or chest pain, do you think they would be fearful that they might catch a headache or angina from you?

You wouldn’t in either case, because you understand that these very real illnesses, these health conditions, are not infectious in nature.

Your family member would comfort you and not be fearful, for they understand that these real conditions are not contagious.

It follows that nobody has tried to kid you that you need an injected vaccine to protect you from migraines or angina, or to protect others from you, for the same reasons. You don’t “catch” these diseases & you cannot transmit them to others.

They arise out of disordered equilibrium inside us, which mostly our bodies fix unaided.

Now to the unbelievable truth. Exactly the same things apply to measles, mumps and rubella. They’re real, but you don’t “catch” them from others. You can’t give them to others.

It follows that the very idea of a “vaccine”, a mysterious mixture of substances, injected into your child’s body, takes on a horribly malign feel to it.

If these Illnesses are not caused by then how even theoretically could an injection prevent them?

The answer is that they cannot & do not protect your child from anything.

Why has this field of lies been sustained & indeed grown?

I’ve done a great deal of research and digging into the dubious history of those we're told are heroic and clever scientists. We find they’re all associated with the antecedents of the supranational elites currently running the covid19 scam, dangerous so-called vaccines and lots of other awful things (eg climate change lies, overpopulation lies).

There’s absolutely no possible benefit to be had by allowing your child to be injected with vaccines. At a low frequency, children are harmed by them. I do not assert that all alleged vaccines are designed to kill people. I do say this about the alleged covid19 injections and I’m the best qualified person speaking out to make this judgement. I think the main reason for the decades of lying & injecting people was to entrain them to do exactly what they were told in the faked pandemic (& there were probably other reasons like profiting).

You may not believe what I’ve written. That’s your choice and privilege. I’m not wrong about several, really central events of the last five years, like the uselessness of PCR based diagnostics, masking and of course the “vaccines”. If I’m wrong about certain details, the one thing I want you to decide is this. “Is Dr Mike Yeadon wrong in some detail? Or is he lying?”

My commitment to everyone is that while I may be wrong from time to time, I’m not lying. Nobody is paying me to say certain things. The above is my truthful opinion.

Please don’t allow your children to be injected with useless, unnecessary and potentially harmful substances.

There is no possible benefit to them. Finally, and perhaps rudely. Please do not allow any thoughts you might have about what other people may think about the decisions you make about your health and that of your children.

Though not a friend, the person I recommend the most for educational evidence underwriting what I’ve said is Dr Sam Bailey of New Zealand.

Best wishes,

Dr. Mike Yeadon

P.S: it is not the case that “everyone in the NHS must know all this, too”. Some do, but I think they’re the minority.’
By Dr. Michael Yeadon December 19, 2024

See https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/dr-yeadon-please-dont-allow-your?utm

Also in December Yeadon published a video message to the Northern Ireland Assembly in response to a proposed Public Health Bill. This is possibly his most uncompromising statement yet. I hope the Northern Ireland Assembly took notice.

‘The people who created the COVID scam are going to do it again, he said. “If you're frightened about what happens if you speak out, you should be absolutely terrified about what's going to happen if you don't .”

See https://expose-news.com/2024/12/06/mike-yeadons-message-to-ni-politicians

And watch the full address here: https://rumble.com/v5taxsk-silver-bullet-dr-yeadon.html