A QUIET EVIL: THE DESTRUCTION OF INFORMED CONSENT...
Today’s edition of The Expose carries an article entitled ‘A Quiet Evil: The Destruction of Informed Consent.’ by Dr Emanuel Garcia.
According to Wikipedia:
“Informed consent is a principle in medical ethics, medical law and media studies, that a patient must have sufficient information and understanding before making decisions about their medical care. Pertinent information may include risks and benefits of treatments, alternative treatments, the patient’s role in treatment, and their right to refuse treatment,”
However, according to psychiatrist, Dr Dr. Emanuel Garcia “Informed consent” as a genuine foundational principal of medicine has been undermined as a result of following an agenda that is “destroying viable and decent medicine in the process,”
Dr Garcia retired from psychiatric practice in 2021, refusing to be inoculated, after working in the public sector in New Zealand, and says unless other doctors who knew about the corrupt and authoritarian medical council of New Zealand “come out of hiding” there will be no medical profession left.
On this website you will find a copy of The Nuremberg Code of 1947, the code of practice for medical practitioners introduced after the horrors of Nazi human experimentation in the concentration camps in Germany was revealed.
The first principle of the Nuremberg Code is as follows:
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.
This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
There is no part of these principles that have not been contravened in the COVID era. The entire human population has been participating in an experiment, and the vast majority of that population was coerced into participating in the experiment with NO POSSIBILITY of Informed Consent – because the information as to the risks involved was not given.
We are only now beginning to witness the consequences of this monumental crime against humanity.
See https://expose-news.com/2024/01/19/a-quiet-evil-the-destruction-of-informed-consent
According to Wikipedia:
“Informed consent is a principle in medical ethics, medical law and media studies, that a patient must have sufficient information and understanding before making decisions about their medical care. Pertinent information may include risks and benefits of treatments, alternative treatments, the patient’s role in treatment, and their right to refuse treatment,”
However, according to psychiatrist, Dr Dr. Emanuel Garcia “Informed consent” as a genuine foundational principal of medicine has been undermined as a result of following an agenda that is “destroying viable and decent medicine in the process,”
Dr Garcia retired from psychiatric practice in 2021, refusing to be inoculated, after working in the public sector in New Zealand, and says unless other doctors who knew about the corrupt and authoritarian medical council of New Zealand “come out of hiding” there will be no medical profession left.
On this website you will find a copy of The Nuremberg Code of 1947, the code of practice for medical practitioners introduced after the horrors of Nazi human experimentation in the concentration camps in Germany was revealed.
The first principle of the Nuremberg Code is as follows:
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.
This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
There is no part of these principles that have not been contravened in the COVID era. The entire human population has been participating in an experiment, and the vast majority of that population was coerced into participating in the experiment with NO POSSIBILITY of Informed Consent – because the information as to the risks involved was not given.
We are only now beginning to witness the consequences of this monumental crime against humanity.
See https://expose-news.com/2024/01/19/a-quiet-evil-the-destruction-of-informed-consent
Trackbacks
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as Linear | Threaded